- From: Jens de Smit <jens.desmit@surfnet.nl>
- Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 14:07:05 +0100
- To: Marengo Marco <marco.marengo@telecomitalia.it>
- CC: "public-poiwg@w3.org" <public-poiwg@w3.org>
On 04/11/2010 14:00, Marengo Marco wrote: > Hi, > you may have heard that Facebook opened its APIs for reading (ok, it was available since a few months) and writing (since yesterday). I think Facebook's definition of "POI" might be interesting for our WG, even if it looks a bit too simple to me. > > [0] is an example request (not sure why the reply is in Italian, I think it depends on the access_token, I beg your pardon for that) and this is a snippet of the response: > > { > "name": "Pizzeria Scirocco", > "category": "Impresa locale", > "location": { > "street": "Via Reiss Romoli 108", > "city": "Torino", > "state": "Piemonte", > "zip": "10148", > "latitude": 45.109457124292, > "longitude": 7.6876812462512 > }, > "id": "158446267518267" > } > > ("Impresa locale" is "Local business") > > As I said, that's probably not enough for us. But that could be a start! Are we considering a non-XML POI representation format? Hey Marco, The short answer: we don't know yet. At least one person proposed that we should have: a) a definition of what data we want to able to represent b) a specification how to record this information in several generic data formats, amongst which XML and JSON AFAIK there has not been a formal decision to go this way but I have not heard anyone speak up against it either. Regards, Jens
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 13:07:37 UTC