Re: [pointerevents] Implicit pointer capture state after a failed explicit capture call at `pointerdown` (#534)

So you're not proposing any real change to the spec, just to clarify the expected behavior?
Adding a note somewhere sounds reasonable. Maybe somewhere near setPointerCapture()?


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by smaug----
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/534#issuecomment-2652394684 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2025 00:54:01 UTC