- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 08:31:46 +0100
- To: Pointer Events Working Group <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
Dear all, from yesteday's meeting, we had a question about the WPTs and the need for passing them all. I asked Philippe, replies below: >> We still have 4 outstanding WPTs to do, but they'll appear there soon. >> Also, remind me: is the condition to get to CR that at least one >> implementation has full coverage? > > You don't need implementations to get to CR. You just need a plan for > how you'll demonstrate implementation experience by the end of it. >> Or that there's at least one >> implementation on a per-test basis that passes? Or is that not even a >> concern anymore these days? > > Still a concern, but later. And we'll need at least two implementation > on a per-test basis that passes, or a good explanation of why not. > [...] > > The only question mark to move to CR is > https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/505 > > I see that it moved 3 days ago: > > https://github.com/w3c/alreq/issues/289 > > but not sure what to conclude from that yet. -- Patrick H. Lauke * https://www.splintered.co.uk/ * https://github.com/patrickhlauke * https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ * https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2025 07:31:57 UTC