- From: Sahir Vellani via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 18:59:39 +0000
- To: public-pointer-events@w3.org
Following up on the conversation from the [deviceId I2S](https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/3eU-AHH8x4k/m/_-4jK0qQAQAJ?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer). I think we should only have a deviceId when we can uniquely identify a particular pointer. > "pointer" (i.e. finger), in which case it may be that we want the name to suggest something about the contact, rather than "device" which suggests something about the device which was contacted with. I think excluding touch from deviceId seems reasonable, at least to me, since I would not expect my individual fingers to be identified, but I can understand the rationale behind this question. I think my vocabulary isn't big enough or an alternative name :P ... it would need to emphasize that the pointer event has the same source device though. -- GitHub Notification of comment by sahirv Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/353#issuecomment-1946977396 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2024 18:59:41 UTC