Re: [pointerevents] ReSpec complains about normative references in informative sections (#271)

thanks @andreastt - i was aware of the technical "why", but your explanation made it clearer for me as to the "if I change this in code, what does it actually *mean* from a spec standpoint". I've made the change here (only substantive change is that `[COMPAT]` is now only an informative, rather than normative, reference - which seems correct to me)

GitHub Notification of comment by patrickhlauke
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2018 09:23:52 UTC