Re: [pointerevents] Should spec defines what triggers pointerover and pointerenter when implicitly releasing pointer capture?

We talked about this in the call today.
@mingchou @smaug---- what do you think of sending the pointerover/enter right after lostpointercapture without waiting for another move event? Does that sound reasonable? I believe this is not what Chrome does right now but we can change Chrome if we all agree on this behavior.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by NavidZ
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/173#issuecomment-380491042 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2018 15:19:48 UTC