W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pointer-events@w3.org > October to December 2017

Re: [pointerevents] "This API always returns at least one coalesced event for pointermove events and an empty list for other types of PointerEvents."

From: Navid Zolghadr via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 21:02:39 +0000
To: public-pointer-events@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-341241565-1509570157-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I totally agree with you myself. So I can add a trusted restriction somewhere. But just to make sure we are on the same boat here. What do you think about guarantees in the other specs? For example this in the original PointerEvent spec:

> Note: all pointerup events will have pressure 0.

Do you agree this and a lot of other instances fall into the same bucket and are inaccurate the same as this issue here? Because a non-trusted pointerup event can have a non-zero pressure or can be targeted to anything regardless of the capturing APIs.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by NavidZ
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/224#issuecomment-341241565 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2017 21:02:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 1 November 2017 21:02:45 UTC