- From: Rick Byers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:54:34 +0000
- To: public-pointer-events@w3.org
@mustaqahmed just had a good suggestion. If we do implicit pointer capture in some cases, we should define it such that when an explicit `setPointerCapture` occurs during a `pointerdown` listener (the common capture case), there ends up being only a single `gotpointercapture` event (not one `got` for the implicit, then a `lost` and `got` for the explicit). -- GitHub Notification of comment by RByers Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/8#issuecomment-232672115 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 14 July 2016 13:54:47 UTC