Re: [pointerevents] Should a captured pointer send boundary events by default?

I have some initial data that we can analyze more deeply. Here is what
 I did - I grabbed the top 200 sites form our usetracker data that use
 pointer events. I then did static analysis from crawler data to find 
sites that had the text `setpointercapture`, `gotpointercapture`, and 
`lostpointercapture`. I then did searches across the usertrackerdata 
to figure out what sites both used pointer events AND had a capture 
related call somewhere on the site.

**Pointer events in use AND `setpointercapture` found in static 
analysis:**
[yandex.ru](yandex.ru)
[yandex.com.tr](yandex.com.tr)
[www.trulia.com](www.trulia.com)
[vimeo.com](vimeo.com)
[www.google.com](www.google.com)

**Pointer events in use AND `gotpointercapture` found in static 
analysis:**
[yandex.ru](yandex.ru)
[yandex.com.tr](yandex.com.tr)
[play.google.com](play.google.com)

**Pointer events in use AND `lostpointercapture` found in static 
analysis:**
[yandex.ru](yandex.ru)
[yandex.com.tr](yandex.com.tr)
[play.google.com](play.google.com)
[www.google.com](www.google.com)
[www.trulia.com](www.trulia.com)
[www.gumtree.com](www.gumtree.com)
[www.wattpad.com](www.wattpad.com)

**_NEXT STEPS:_**

- I want to re-run the analysis with the top 1000 sites from our 
usetracker just to ensure that we have better coverage.
- I want to also run static analysis and comparisons for 
`pointerleave`, `pointerout`, `pointerenter`, and `pointerover`.
- We need to do deeper analysis and debugging on each site (thankfully
 it is a short list) to figure out how they are using pointer events 
to really figure out if they would be adversely affected by any 
changes we would propose to make in this area. 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by teddink
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/61#issuecomment-231822886 
using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 11 July 2016 18:30:56 UTC