- From: Navid Zolghadr <nzolghadr@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 21:48:06 +0000
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, “public-pointer-events@w3.org” <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 20 May 2016 16:04:22 UTC
Hi Patrick, That would be great if we can cover the following issues in tomorrow's meetings: 1. Default width/height attribute for mouse ( https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/65) 2. Spec implies lost/gotpointercapture is delayed until the next pointer event but Edge does otherwise ( https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/32) 3. Should a captured pointer send transition events by default? ( https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/61 <https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/61>) - along with https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/39 and https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/8 as it seems Ted has more info about them. 4. Pointermove should not require a hit-test by default for touch ( https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/8) - We talked about #3 but we didn't talk about implicit capture which this issue includes as well. 5. Mouse Event compatibility model for touch is incompatible with current practice (https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/7) - It seems that we are okay with moving to gesture based compat mouse events for touch. Should we add it to the spec now? Cheers, Navid
Received on Friday, 20 May 2016 16:04:22 UTC