Re: [pointerevents] Incorrect order of the events in process pending pointer capture section

On [the call] it seemed this issue was largely blocked on the big 
fundamental question of what the right model for transition events 
during capture is.  Filed #61 to try to get consensus on that.

If we want to move forward in parallel with that, it seems there was 
agreement that:
1. Firing transition events at one element after a new one has 
received `gotpointercapture` is a bug
  * Step 20 and 21 should occur before 19 (and possibly before 18) 
[above](https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/39#issue-139363428)
2. The spec should indicate that `pointerover` and `pointerout` behave
 the same as `pointerenter` and `pointerleave` during capture in that 
they reflect the bounds of the captured element and all it's 
descendants.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by RByers
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/39#issuecomment-216951227 
using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2016 18:06:36 UTC