Re: [pointerevents] Pointermove should not require a hit-test by default

Yes, that's the direction I'd like to try (or maybe instead of 
treating implicit capture differently, setPointerCapture lets you 
specify whether you want over/out and implicit capture never asks for 
over/out).  But this might be too breaking, and there are other 
possible solutions (I believe Jacob has some ideas of his own).  So we
 probably want to keep this issue described in terms of the outcome we
 want to achieve, not how to achieve it (because we won't know that 
until we've done extensive prototyping and compat testing).

-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by RByers
See 
https://github.com/w3c/pointerevents/issues/8#issuecomment-94555329

Received on Monday, 20 April 2015 20:07:38 UTC