W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pointer-events@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Tests for asynchronous events (10.2, 11.2)

From: Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 17:53:42 +0300
Message-ID: <5405D9F6.1050504@pettay.fi>
To: Maksim Lebedev <alessarik@gmail.com>, public-pointer-events@w3.org
I think the issue here is that in one place the spec says got/lostpointercapture are async (sure, the table is non-normative, but still),
and then https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/tip/pointerEvents.html#process-pending-pointer-capture and other places in the spec say that
in some cases the got/lostpointercapture is dispatched in more sync manner.

So, I think the non-normative table should says sync/async for got/lostpointercapture.

-Olli


On 08/22/2014 04:24 PM, Maksim Lebedev wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I am very doubt by tests of asyncronoun events.
> pointerevent_gotpointercapture_before_first_pointerevent-manual.html
> pointerevent_lostpointercapture_is_first-manual.html
>
> According specification of pointer events got/lostpointercapture events should be async.
>
> But latest changes made something, which was confusing me:
> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/commit/e4c7116d8cb7289b84ab2feddd7178fda23b4f5e
> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/commit/24577bb71789010738a0b1cd9d371a07f0f2cfe1
>
> After this changes we can find that test execute setPointerCapture (or releasePointerCapture) and
> after that timer is setted for changing isAsync to true. Also we can find that on gotpointercapture event
>
> (or on lostpointercaptere event) tests checks isAsync.
>
> In what sequence this items should be executed?
> Timer with (isAsync = true) at first. And after this gotpointercapture should be fired.
>
> Opposite. gotpointercapture should be fired at first, And only about this Timer with (isAsync = true)
>
> There is specification for timers:
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/webappapis.html#timers
>
> I can assume that current version of tests are incorrect.
>
> And author of changes notifyed that IE didn't pass tests:
> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/1113#issue-38207053
>
> At this point, if tests are incorrect, then tests should be changed for correct state.
>
> I can propose to delete creating timer and simply only set isAsync to true after setPointerCapture (releasePointerCapture)
>
> Please, let me know your opinion.
>
> Thanks, Maksim Lebedev.
>
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 14:54:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:48:10 UTC