- From: Scott González <scott.gonzalez@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 15:56:14 -0400
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Cc: Pointer Events Working Group <public-pointer-events@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAO8i3if116yPtJKC=5zJPeXCKANuA2b4-478Nwsvh-d63Bh4rg@mail.gmail.com>
Some of these did get covered in tests that made it to master already. I've submitted https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/1112 and https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/1113 for the remaining assertions that were covered in TTWF. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/13/14 9:17 PM, Scott González wrote: > >> I believe the following is the full list of assertions from the TTWF >> event that haven't been already implemented in web-platform-tests. >> >> TA 3.1, 3.2 - pointerup properties matching pointerdown properties >> https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/ >> 6d1a680451dcacb23ccfeb907c024a124ab3a8ec/pointerup.html#L133 >> We do have the equivalent tests for pointermove (5.1, 5.2) in >> pointerevent_pointermove_isprimary_same_as_pointerdown.html >> > > What's the plan/recommendation? Are you or Dave going to resubmit the test > file or update one of the merged files? > > > TA 12.1 - constructor assertions >> https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/ >> master/constructor.html >> > > What's the plan here? Do we need someone to review this? > > > There are more extensive pointerleave tests with deeply nested elements, >> but I'm not sure if this is necessary: >> https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/ >> master/pointerenterleave-continuous.html >> > > Perhaps one option for tests like these is to tag them with something like > `stress test` and thus distinguish it as something that isn't strictly need > to "test the Candidate Recommendation". WDYT? > > > > gotpointercapture and lostpointercapture events should be fired >> asynchronously. There is no Test Assertion for this, but this is covered by >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24971 >> gotpointercapture: https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/ >> 6d1a680451dcacb23ccfeb907c024a124ab3a8ec/pointercaptureevents.html#L106 >> lostpointercapture: https://github.com/dmethvin/pointerevents-test/blob/ >> 6d1a680451dcacb23ccfeb907c024a124ab3a8ec/pointercaptureevents.html#L129 >> > > So it sounds like we need someone to review this and when all issues are > resolved to merge it? > > -Thanks, Art > > >
Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 19:56:42 UTC