- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 13:11:05 +0000
- To: public-pointer-events@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24971
Bug ID: 24971
Summary: Should got/lostpointercapture be dispatched
asynchronously or synchronously
Product: PointerEventsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Pointer Events specification
Assignee: jrossi@microsoft.com
Reporter: bugs@pettay.fi
QA Contact: public-pointer-events-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: public-pointer-events@w3.org
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/tip/pointerEvents.html#list-of-pointer-events
says those events are asynchronous
and so does
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/tip/pointerEvents.html#the-gotpointercapture-event
and
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/tip/pointerEvents.html#the-lostpointercapture-event
But the algorithm in
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/tip/pointerEvents.html#pointer-capture
doesn't talk about tasks or async dispatching.
It just says
"Fire a gotpointercapture event at the Element on which this method was
invoked."
and "Fire a lostpointercapture event at the Element on which this method was
invoked."
The algorithm should probably say something like
"...queue a task to fire a pointer event named 'got/lostpointercapture on
element"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 7 March 2014 13:11:06 UTC