- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 13:11:05 +0000
- To: public-pointer-events@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24971 Bug ID: 24971 Summary: Should got/lostpointercapture be dispatched asynchronously or synchronously Product: PointerEventsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Pointer Events specification Assignee: jrossi@microsoft.com Reporter: bugs@pettay.fi QA Contact: public-pointer-events-bugzilla@w3.org CC: public-pointer-events@w3.org https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/tip/pointerEvents.html#list-of-pointer-events says those events are asynchronous and so does https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/tip/pointerEvents.html#the-gotpointercapture-event and https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/tip/pointerEvents.html#the-lostpointercapture-event But the algorithm in https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/raw-file/tip/pointerEvents.html#pointer-capture doesn't talk about tasks or async dispatching. It just says "Fire a gotpointercapture event at the Element on which this method was invoked." and "Fire a lostpointercapture event at the Element on which this method was invoked." The algorithm should probably say something like "...queue a task to fire a pointer event named 'got/lostpointercapture on element" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 7 March 2014 13:11:06 UTC