- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 07:36:21 +0100
- To: public-pointer-events@w3.org
On 03/06/2014 06:54, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > don't have easy access to the previous discussion, but what happens again if the parent node is also gone? does it try to find THAT node's parent? should the spec say something about this too? Re-reading the conversation in the bug, I wonder if the following would capture the situation more comprehensively: "should be fired at the original target's nearest ancestor node" P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2014 06:36:44 UTC