Re: Apparent inconsistency between W3C Pointer Event spec and EMMA 1.1 spec [Honeywell Internal] from Arthur Barstow on 2013-10-01 (public-pointer-events@w3.org from October to December 2013)

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 11:45:50 -0400
To: "ext Hickman, Steve (AdvTech)" <Steve.Hickman@honeywell.com>
CC: "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>, "www-multimodal@w3.org" <www-multimodal@w3.org>
Message-ID: <524AEE2E.7050604@nokia.com>

On 10/1/13 11:11 AM, ext Hickman, Steve (AdvTech) wrote:
> Is there a compelling reason why one spec can't just refer to the other one for this concept?

Perhaps you can solve this problem by EMMA1.1 (still in WD phase) 
referencing the Pointer Event spec (Candidate Recommendation).

-AB

Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2013 15:58:12 UTC