[Bug 26013] Note in "10 Pointer Capture" to mention implicit pointer capture from bugzilla@jessica.w3.org on 2014-07-15 (public-pointer-events-bugzilla@w3.org from July to September 2014)

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:27:23 +0000
To: public-pointer-events-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-26013-6003-uIgofSzOiV@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26013

Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---

--- Comment #2 from Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> ---
Two minor queries on this:

- "Implicit Set of Pointer Capture" read slightly awkward. Could it be changed
to "Implicit Pointer Capture" (as the text also deals with the implicit release
of pointer capture, not just setting)

- Should this be in an informative NOTE ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2014 15:27:25 UTC