- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:07:01 +0000
- To: public-pointer-events-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24923 --- Comment #12 from Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> --- JR: "Do we want spec text to describe this fix up behavior?" I'm all for making the spec as explicit as possible to avoid surprises and possible implementation divergence...so I'd favor something in the spec. I'd propose something like: - add a break in the first paragraph of section 11, so that "Unless otherwise..." beings a new paragraph. - at the end of the "Unless..." sentence, add something along the lines of "If the target of the pointer event is removed from the document before the relevant compatibility mouse event is fired, the compatibility mouse event MAY be fired on the parent of the original target." Admittedly a mouthful and a bit awkward, but hopefully clear enough? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2014 10:07:02 UTC