- From: Michael Steidl \(IPTC\) <mdirector@iptc.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:21:41 +0200
- To: <benedict.whittamsmith@thomsonreuters.com>, "'W3C POE WG'" <public-poe-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <03cc01d33609$9b615850$d22408f0$@iptc.org>
Hi Ben - and all, based on today's discussion I've created POE Github Issue 266 (https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/267) to harmonize how to evaluate a Duty with consequences. While writing that I concluded we should explicitly tell that some evaluations need more than 1 step or round: * Duty: Round 1: the Duty is evaluated without including consequences IF the state of this evaluation is Not-Fulfilled (because the action was not exercised) then . . Round 2: the evaluator checks if the action has been exercised AND the consequences have been fulfilled. Only then the final state of the Duty is Fulfilled. The essential issue is: a round-2-evaluation must know about that as else having an exercised action is sufficient to set the state to Fulfilled, only in this 2nd-round case the consequences must be evaluated too. * Prohibition: Round 1: the Prohibition is evaluated without including remedies Then the prohibited action has been exercised . Round 2: The remedies of the Prohibition have to be evaluated and they should be Fulfilled. I think it would be of great help for the Evaluator page to explicitly show these steps/rounds: * Example 21 The second column, currently without a head, could be headed as "1st evaluation" and the 5th column with "2nd evaluation" * Example 23 Second column heading: "1st duty-evaluation", 4th column: "2nd duty-evaluation" * Example 24: 2nd column heading: "2nd evaluation" or "remedy evaluation" Thanks for considering that, Michael
Received on Monday, 25 September 2017 14:22:17 UTC