- From: <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 14:29:50 +0200
- To: Renato Iannella <renato.iannella@monegraph.com>
- Cc: POE Public <public-poe-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20170905142950.Horde.n22yJX7Yart9Dc4L3_D43c_@www.fi.upm.es>
Hi,
If you try this in the ODRL Validator at
http://odrlapi.appspot.com/ the result is:
valid warning. Please consider using Assets with a URI
I opted for this verification result because the spec says SHOULD and
not MUST.
<http://odrlapi.appspot.com/samples/sample002>
a odrl:Policy ;
odrl:permission [
odrl:target _:Asset1 ;
odrl:assignee _:Alice ;
odrl:action odrl:print ;
odrl:constraint [
odrl:leftOperand odrl:spatial;
odrl:operator odrl:eq ;
odrl:rightOperand "http://vocab.getty.edu/tgn/7353123"
] ;
] .
Renato Iannella <renato.iannella@monegraph.com> escribió:
>> On 5 Sep 2017, at 18:29, Michael Steidl (IPTC) <mdirector@iptc.org> wrote:
>>
>> My semantic interpretation of the Permission: it permits to Alice
>> to print the Asset1 in geographic area with the Getty Vocabulary id
>> 7353123
>
> Great….but my real question is; is this Rule Valid or Not-Valid ?
>
>
>> Formally I think
>> odrl:rightOperand <http://vocab.getty.edu/tgn/7353123
>> <http://vocab.getty.edu/tgn/7353123>> ;
>> would fit better as this http-string should be an IRI.
>
> The corrected URI is actually http://vocab.getty.edu/tgn/7353132
> A great part of the world ;-)
>
> Renato Iannella, Monegraph
> Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group
Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2017 12:30:18 UTC