- From: <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 14:29:50 +0200
- To: Renato Iannella <renato.iannella@monegraph.com>
- Cc: POE Public <public-poe-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20170905142950.Horde.n22yJX7Yart9Dc4L3_D43c_@www.fi.upm.es>
Hi, If you try this in the ODRL Validator at http://odrlapi.appspot.com/ the result is: valid warning. Please consider using Assets with a URI I opted for this verification result because the spec says SHOULD and not MUST. <http://odrlapi.appspot.com/samples/sample002> a odrl:Policy ; odrl:permission [ odrl:target _:Asset1 ; odrl:assignee _:Alice ; odrl:action odrl:print ; odrl:constraint [ odrl:leftOperand odrl:spatial; odrl:operator odrl:eq ; odrl:rightOperand "http://vocab.getty.edu/tgn/7353123" ] ; ] . Renato Iannella <renato.iannella@monegraph.com> escribió: >> On 5 Sep 2017, at 18:29, Michael Steidl (IPTC) <mdirector@iptc.org> wrote: >> >> My semantic interpretation of the Permission: it permits to Alice >> to print the Asset1 in geographic area with the Getty Vocabulary id >> 7353123 > > Great….but my real question is; is this Rule Valid or Not-Valid ? > > >> Formally I think >> odrl:rightOperand <http://vocab.getty.edu/tgn/7353123 >> <http://vocab.getty.edu/tgn/7353123>> ; >> would fit better as this http-string should be an IRI. > > The corrected URI is actually http://vocab.getty.edu/tgn/7353132 > A great part of the world ;-) > > Renato Iannella, Monegraph > Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group
Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2017 12:30:18 UTC