- From: Renato Iannella <renato.iannella@monegraph.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 16:31:27 +1000
- To: POE WG <public-poe-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 22 May 2017 06:32:11 UTC
Dear all, after the F2F decisions: 1 - remove scopes and replace with constraints + individual/collection classes for Assets and Parties [1] 2 - introduce narrowerThan and alsoRequires for Actions/Assets/Parties [2] The attached updated ODRL IM diagram is proposed. (comments welcome…) (Note that one wide-reviewer has disagreed to the removal of the use of SKOS in the ODRL ontology [2] and points to its use in the Annotation Vocab [3].) Renato [1] https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/183 <https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/183> [2] https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/160 <https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/160> [3] https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-vocab/#extending-motivations <https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-vocab/#extending-motivations>
Received on Monday, 22 May 2017 06:32:11 UTC