Re: Test suite skeleton

> On 11 May 2017, at 01:54, Renato Iannella <renato.iannella@monegraph.com <mailto:renato.iannella@monegraph.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 10 May 2017, at 18:42, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org <mailto:phila@w3.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> I've also been thinking more about the SHACL issue. If we don't provide those, then how will someone test whether their ODRL is valid?
> 
> What did the W3C Annotation WG use?

We did not use SHACL and it was more a 'manual' check for the test cases. But remember when we did the testing the situation around SHACL was fairly messy. I have not followed the latest evolution, so I do not know who stable it is now; Simon or Phil could tell us. Also: are there implementations for SHACL, is there a tool I can install on my machine for SHACL? Relying on a single playground site may not be good enough (eg, if an implementer wants to check things locally)

Ivan


> 
> Renato Iannella, Monegraph
> Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>