[Minutes] 2017 02 27

The minutes of today's POE WG meeting are at
https://www.w3.org/2017/02/27-poe-minutes with a text snapshot below.

Main take-away: we need to send lots of e-mails and generate reviews.


   Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Teleconference

27 Feb 2017

    [2]Agenda

       [2] https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20170227

    See also: [3]IRC log

       [3] http://www.w3.org/2017/02/27-poe-irc

Attendees

    Present
           renato, Serena, michaelS, benws_, CarolineB, ivan,
           Brian_Ulicny, simonstey, phila, victor, smyles

    Regrets
           Sabrina

    Chair
           renato

    Scribe
           Serena

Contents

      * [4]Topics
          1. [5]F2F meeting in London
      * [6]Summary of Action Items
      * [7]Summary of Resolutions
      __________________________________________________________

    <renato> [8]https://www.w3.org/2017/02/13-poe-minutes.html

       [8] https://www.w3.org/2017/02/13-poe-minutes.html

    Proposal: approve last meeting minutes

    Minutes approved

    <renato> [9]https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Deliverables

       [9] https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Deliverables

    renato: we are collecting potential groups and individual to
    ask for review and feedback

    <renato> [10]https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Email_Template

      [10] https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Email_Template

    renato: the email template has been sent around
    ... is there anyone having comments on the text?
    ... I'd allow people to add issues on github directly
    ... should we set a deadline for the feedback?

    ivan: we need to give them as much as time we can
    ... the F2F is mid-may so I'd say end of April and then two
    weeks to set most urgent issues by github and emails

    renato: April 30th then

    <renato> [11]https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Deliverables

      [11] https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Deliverables

    renato: here there is the list of people

    <renato> [12]https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/charter#coordination

      [12] https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/charter#coordination

    phila: W3C wide means several groups, I'll send the email to
    these groups

    <phila> ACTION: phila to contact groups listed at
    [13]https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/charter#coordination [recorded
    in [14]http://www.w3.org/2017/02/27-poe-minutes.html#action01]

      [13] https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/charter#coordination
      [14] http://www.w3.org/2017/02/27-poe-minutes.html#action01]

    <trackbot> Created ACTION-42 - Contact groups listed at
    [15]https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/charter#coordination [on Phil
    Archer - due 2017-03-06].

      [15] https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/charter#coordination

    phila: the attention we need from internationalization is clear

    <simonstey> a lot

    ivan: do we have any property whose value is text?

    <simonstey> all descriptions

    ivan: then internationalization comes in

    <simonstey> e.g.
    [16]http://w3c.github.io/poe/vocab/#term-Assertion

      [16] http://w3c.github.io/poe/vocab/#term-Assertion

    renato: ODRL I'll take care of sending it, IPTC is up to
    Michael

    ivan: for BSIG send an email to Bill

    renato: the other contact persons are in the list. EDRLab -
    Michael. Is there any reasonable contact with CC?

    <renato>
    [17]https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/PandOE/results

      [17] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/PandOE/results

    renato: AC Review members
    ... what's the best way to handle this?

    <CarolineB> I should be able to dig out someone from CC but at
    the policy rather than technical end. If htat's any help?

    phila: anyone who showed an interest should be contacted

    renato: any other group to be contacted?
    ... the second part is the actual horizontal review

    <simonstey> [18]https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/

      [18] https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/

    phila: accessibility, I don't think there are issues here

    ivan: in my experience it may happen that people in the
    accessibility group may comment on the accessibility of the
    documents

    <renato>
    [19]https://www.w3.org/International/techniques/developing-spec
    s?collapse

      [19] 
https://www.w3.org/International/techniques/developing-specs?collapse

    renato: internationalization, there is a questionnaire
    ... do we simply fill in the questionnaire and then we send it
    to them, is that the process?

    ivan: fill in the questionnaire and then contact them to tell
    that we did it

    <renato> [20]https://w3ctag.github.io/security-questionnaire/

      [20] https://w3ctag.github.io/security-questionnaire/

    renato: security, another questionnaire
    ... it seems there is not much for us
    ... is there any security guy here?

    <benws_> Sorry guys - got to fly

    <simonstey> +q

    renato: there is privacy section and a security one

    simonstey: the answers is what we put in the related section in
    our document

    phila: we're not covering access control so these questions do
    not apply for us

    renato: how do we proceed ?

    <renato> [21]http://gregnorc.github.io/ping-privacy-questions/

      [21] http://gregnorc.github.io/ping-privacy-questions/

    renato: I'll contact them
    ... privacy, we need to look at this in more details

    <renato>
    [22]https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core/#privacy

      [22] https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core/#privacy

    renato: the privacy questionnaire has to be answered and then
    look at them as a group and if we are satisfied with them we
    can send them.
    ... and that's it for the horizontal reviews

    <phila> agenda:
    [23]https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20170227

      [23] https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20170227

    renato: questions or comments on the review process?
    ... we can move to other business

    <renato> [24]https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/track/actions/open

      [24] https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/track/actions/open

    renato: there are a number of open actions
    ... please close the actions when you're done with it

    <phila> [25]Raised issues

      [25] https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/track/issues/raised

    phila: there are two raised issues at this stage and it's
    remarkable
    ... they're quite old

    renato: we started raising issues on GitHub
    ... I have to have a look, I think that issue #11 is fine
    ... but issue #10 I'm not sure

    <simonstey> issue-10

    <trackbot> issue-10 -- What does it mean for
    permissions/prohibitions/duties if their constraint(s) are
    (un)satisfied? -- raised

    <trackbot> [26]https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/track/issues/10

      [26] https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/track/issues/10

    renato: we can move these two issues on Github to track them

F2F meeting in London

    renato: do we have any logistics? Ben will provide more details
    soon.
    ... if you plan to come please add your name?
    ... we will look at the feedback we get and we will review the
    documents accordingly
    ... any other business for today's call?
    ... five days of meetings for some people
    ... rights management conference

Summary of Action Items

    [NEW] ACTION: phila to contact groups listed at
    https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/charter#coordination [recorded in
    [27]http://www.w3.org/2017/02/27-poe-minutes.html#action01]

      [27] http://www.w3.org/2017/02/27-poe-minutes.html#action01

Summary of Resolutions

    [End of minutes]
      __________________________________________________________

Received on Monday, 27 February 2017 13:17:43 UTC