public-poe-wg@w3.org from October 2016 by date

Monday, 31 October 2016

• [Minutes] 2016-10-31 Phil Archer
• poe-ACTION-35: Write virtualf2f agenda Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Reassessing applicability of (legacy) concepts Sabrina Kirrane

Friday, 28 October 2016

• [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (31 OCT 2016) Renato Iannella

Tuesday, 25 October 2016

• Re: [Minutes] 2016-10-24 Incl. *Time change next week* Renato Iannella
• Re: Reassessing applicability of (legacy) concepts Renato Iannella

Monday, 24 October 2016

• RE: [Minutes] 2016-10-24 Incl. *Time change next week* benedict.whittamsmith@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: [Minutes] 2016-10-24 Incl. *Time change next week* Phil Archer
• RE: [Minutes] 2016-10-24 Incl. *Time change next week* Myles, Stuart
• [Minutes] 2016-10-24 Incl. *Time change next week* Phil Archer
• Re: [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (24 OCT 2016) Caroline Boyd
• Re: Duty Unit Constraint Víctor Rodríguez Doncel
• RE: [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (24 OCT 2016) benedict.whittamsmith@thomsonreuters.com
• Reassessing applicability of (legacy) concepts Simon Steyskal
• RE: [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (24 OCT 2016) Michael Steidl \(IPTC\)
• Re: UC links? Simon Steyskal
• Call for Exclusions (Update): ODRL Information Model; ODRL Vocabulary & Expression Xueyuan Jia

Friday, 21 October 2016

• Re: UC links? Renato Iannella
• Re: UC links? Simon Steyskal
• [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (24 OCT 2016) Renato Iannella

Thursday, 20 October 2016

• Closed Actions Renato Iannella
• Re: TPAC/Reqs summary Simon Steyskal
• TPAC/Reqs summary Renato Iannella
• Re: BISG Use Cases Renato Iannella

Wednesday, 19 October 2016

• Re: Resolution 23 Simon Steyskal
• Duty Unit Constraint Renato Iannella
• Resolution 23 Renato Iannella
• BISG Use Cases Renato Iannella

Tuesday, 18 October 2016

• RE: ODRL XML Encoding Myles, Stuart
• Tracking Actions Renato Iannella
• Minor ODRL update Renato Iannella
• ODRL XML Encoding Renato Iannella
• Scope in the ODRL Model Renato Iannella
• Re: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? Renato Iannella

Monday, 17 October 2016

• RE: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? Myles, Stuart
• [Minutes][2016-10-17 Phil Archer
• Re: [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (17 OCT 2016) Víctor Rodríguez Doncel

Saturday, 15 October 2016

• Re: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? Renato Iannella

Friday, 14 October 2016

• Re: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? Johnston, Patrick - Hoboken
• Re: The crazy 'qualified' idea:-) Johnston, Patrick - Hoboken
• RE: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? Myles, Stuart
• Complex Constraints Renato Iannella
• Extended Relations Renato Iannella
• [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (17 OCT 2016) Renato Iannella
• Re: The crazy 'qualified' idea:-) Renato Iannella
• Re: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? Renato Iannella

Thursday, 13 October 2016

• Re: The crazy 'qualified' idea:-) Johnston, Patrick - Hoboken
• RE: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? Myles, Stuart
• Re: The crazy 'qualified' idea:-) Renato Iannella

Monday, 10 October 2016

• [Minutes] 2016-10-10 Phil Archer
• The crazy 'qualified' idea:-) Ivan Herman

Sunday, 9 October 2016

• Re: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? Ivan Herman
• Re: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? Renato Iannella

Saturday, 8 October 2016

• Re: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? Ivan Herman

Friday, 7 October 2016

• RE: poe-ACTION-30: Can we only have a json-ld serialisation? will it impact righstml? Myles, Stuart

Thursday, 6 October 2016

• Re: Status of POE.R.DM.09 "Complex Constraints" Renato Iannella
• Re: Status of POE.R.DM.06 "Support relative time constraints" Renato Iannella
• Status of POE.R.DM.09 "Complex Constraints" Simon Steyskal
• Status of POE.R.DM.06 "Support relative time constraints" Simon Steyskal
• Re: Status of POE.R.V.08? Renato Iannella
• Re: Status of POE.R.V.03? Renato Iannella
• Status of POE.R.V.08? Simon Steyskal
• Status of POE.R.V.03? Simon Steyskal

Wednesday, 5 October 2016

• Re: Save the date 5 December (was Re: Virtual F2F, choosing the date - pls complete the Doodle) Phil Archer
• Re: Save the date 5 December (was Re: Virtual F2F, choosing the date - pls complete the Doodle) Víctor Rodríguez Doncel
• [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (10 OCT 2016) Renato Iannella
• Save the date 5 December (was Re: Virtual F2F, choosing the date - pls complete the Doodle) Phil Archer

Tuesday, 4 October 2016

• Re: poe-ACTION-33: Write to antoine asking for example that odrl can't handle Phil Archer

Monday, 3 October 2016

• Virtual F2F, choosing the date - pls complete the Doodle Phil Archer
• [Minutes] 2016-10-03 Minutes and more Phil Archer
• poe-ACTION-34: Update ucr according to today's discussion Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Issue Tracker
• poe-ACTION-33: Write to antoine asking for example that odrl can't handle Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Issue Tracker
• poe-ACTION-32: Write to antoine as heads up for renato's mail Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Another approach to the non-reification problem... Ivan Herman
• Re: Another approach to the non-reification problem... Renato Iannella

Last message date: Monday, 31 October 2016 16:23:38 UTC