- From: Michael Steidl \(IPTC\) <mdirector@iptc.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:06:51 +0100
- To: "'W3C POE WG'" <public-poe-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 28 November 2016 17:07:29 UTC
Hi all, after today’s POE call I have edited the page with a draft of proposed changes of Constraints - https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Constraints * A column with Labels is added * I’ve modified some proposed changes this way: if they only provided a more precise definition but did not change the semantics substantially the constraint term got a modified label but the term (= id) was left untouched. * … and I withdrew proposals to deprecate terms with the “old” term id and to create terms with a new id as the modified label shows the refined definition. (I hope users of ODRL will get that.) * As suggested at the call I added “NT (= Narrower Term) of” relationships to new terms which should be at a hierarchical level below another term. * The “Proposal regarding the Constraint class” at the top of the page got two examples added. I hope this helps the discussion of Constraints on next Monday. Best, Michael Michael Steidl IPTC [mdirector@iptc.org]
Received on Monday, 28 November 2016 17:07:29 UTC