- From: Renato Iannella <renato.iannella@monegraph.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:50:21 +1000
- To: W3C POE WG <public-poe-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <D14C9CEB-A21E-4D38-8788-06D9DE15E50A@monegraph.com>
Dear all, the draft teleconference meeting minutes from Monday’s weekly call: https://www.w3.org/2016/11/14-poe-minutes <https://www.w3.org/2016/11/14-poe-minutes> and from Tuesday’s additional Constraint call: https://www.w3.org/2016/11/15-poe-irc <https://www.w3.org/2016/11/15-poe-irc> The main outcome from the Constraint call was to improve the definitions of the Constraint Names and Comments for clarity and consistency, and to “enable" processing (such as to indicate which variable to compare) with guidelines in the comments. This has started here: https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Constraints <https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Constraints> As well as to review the Constraints narrative in the ODRL Information Model. They are tracked on GitHub [1] [2] - and additional feedback welcome there. @simon I have added your Tracker Issue#10 to [2] (and a new [3] for Issue#11) The Constraint discussion will continue on Monday… Renato Iannella, Monegraph Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group [1] https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/67 <https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/67> [2] https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/68 <https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/68> [3] https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/69 <https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/69>
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2016 00:50:59 UTC