- From: Renato Iannella <renato.iannella@monegraph.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 14:23:21 +1000
- To: W3C POE WG <public-poe-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2016 04:23:59 UTC
> On 9 Nov. 2016, at 00:54, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > I realize this is very close to what you write; I just do not understand why changing any structures by moving the domain of constraints on Action/Name. Just extending the current domain of odrl:constraint seems to be the least disruptive thing to do… The motivation was to make it clear what the Constraint applies to. Otherwise, we can have four Constraints in a Permission, then we would have to have Michael’s “odrl:constraintSubject” property in each to say what it applies to. Renato Iannella, Monegraph Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2016 04:23:59 UTC