- From: Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 11:06:53 +0000
- To: public-poe-wg@w3.org
poe-ISSUE-11 (parties of perm/proh): Does every permission/prohibition need to have both an assignee & assigner? [POE - Information Model] https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/track/issues/11 Raised by: Simon Steyskal On product: POE - Information Model The current spec states (comments inline; similar for prohibition): > 3.4 Permission > > The Permission entity indicates the Actions that the assignee is permitted to perform on the associated Asset. It is not required for perm/proh to have any party assigned. > In other words, what the assigner (supplier) has granted to the assignee (consumer). I would argue that not every assigner/assignee has the role of a supplier/consumer. > [...] > Party: the Permission MUST refer to one or more Party entities linked via the Role entity (see Section 2.3.1) (OPTIONAL) Is it possible to combine MUST and OPTIONAL?
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2016 11:07:00 UTC