- From: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:45:59 +0100
- To: W3C POE WG <public-poe-wg@w3.org>
Hi! While working on an in-depth analysis/review of ODRL's constraint mechanism, I noticed some inconsistent definitions/uses of ODRL constraint components.. Information Model [1]: -> "For example, the “number of usages” (name) must be “smaller than” (operator) the “number 10” (rightOperand)." Vocabulary [2]: -> only defines "4.13 Right Operands for Constraints", no "name"/leftOperand -> as such, "number of usages" (i.e., count) is defined as child property of rightOperand [3] simon [1] http://w3c.github.io/poe/model/#constraint [2] https://w3c.github.io/poe/vocab/#constraintActions [3] https://w3c.github.io/poe/vocab/#term-count -- DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2016 09:46:30 UTC