public-poe-wg@w3.org from June 2016 by date

Thursday, 30 June 2016

• Requirements for Policy Bundle and Use Bundle? Myles, Stuart

Wednesday, 29 June 2016

• poe-ACTION-16: Create new UC(s) to show the need for the ability to specify a fee within and outside the POE expressio Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Issue Tracker
• poe-ACTION-15: Create new UC(s) to show the need for the ability to define categories of licensees and categories of assets Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: Comments on one requirement Michael Steidl \(IPTC\)
• poe-ACTION-14: Create new UC(s) to show the need for expressing explicitly to what a constraint applies. Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Issue Tracker

Monday, 27 June 2016

• [Minutes] 2016-06-27 Phil Archer
• [Minutes] 2016-06-20 Phil Archer

Friday, 24 June 2016

• Comments on one requirement Víctor Rodríguez Doncel
• [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (27 June 2016) Renato Iannella

Monday, 20 June 2016

• poe-ACTION-13: Add requirement Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Issue Tracker
• Regrets for POE Telecon on 20th June Serena Villata

Sunday, 19 June 2016

• [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (20 June 2016) benedict.whittamsmith@thomsonreuters.com

Friday, 17 June 2016

• Likely Regrets for POE Telecon on 20th June Myles, Stuart
• What the Requirements Editors would like to discuss on Monday, 20 June Michael Steidl \(IPTC\)
• Regrets for Monday 20th Jo Rabin

Thursday, 16 June 2016

• poe-ACTION-12: Write up rob atkinson's use case Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 14 June 2016

• poe-ISSUE-9 (BestPractice): Development of an ODRL Best Practices NOTE Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Issue Tracker

Monday, 13 June 2016

• [Minutes] 2016-06-13 Phil Archer
• ISSUE-8: Should requirements be limited to those that we plan to fulfill? Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Issue Tracker

Friday, 10 June 2016

• [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (13 June 2016) Renato Iannella

Thursday, 9 June 2016

• Call 13 June - apologies Michael Steidl \(IPTC\)
• Re: POE Requirements: already a draft for a solution? Renato Iannella
• Re: Talk about comments on requirements Víctor Rodríguez Doncel
• RE: POE Requirements: already a draft for a solution? Simon Steyskal
• Talk about comments on requirements Michael Steidl \(IPTC\)
• RE: POE Requirements: already a draft for a solution? Michael Steidl \(IPTC\)
• Re: POE Requirements: already a draft for a solution? Renato Iannella
• POE Requirements: already a draft for a solution? Michael Steidl \(IPTC\)

Tuesday, 7 June 2016

• Re: [Minutes] 2016-06-06 Renato Iannella
• poe-ISSUE-7 (LicenceMapping): Guidelines for mapping ODRL to Instant Licenses Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Issue Tracker
• poe-ISSUE-6 (Profiles): ODRL Profiles Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Issue Tracker
• poe-ISSUE-5 (Conformance): Conformance of ODRL Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Issue Tracker
• poe-ISSUE-4 (HorizontalReview): Horizontal Review of Deliverables Permissions and Obligations Expression Working Group Issue Tracker

Monday, 6 June 2016

• [Minutes] 2016-06-06 Phil Archer
• Fwd: facilitating requirement cross references in the ucr document Ivan Herman

Friday, 3 June 2016

• Re: FW: Questions re POE.UC.01 Víctor Rodríguez Doncel
• [Agenda] W3C POE WG Teleconference (6 June 2016) Renato Iannella

Thursday, 2 June 2016

• Re: [Minutes] 2016-05-30 Víctor Rodríguez Doncel
• [Minutes] 2016-05-30 Renato Iannella
• RE: POE: question regarding use case UC.04 Michael Steidl \(IPTC\)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:25:22 UTC