- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:04:17 +0100
- To: Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>, public-poe-wg@w3.org
Probably not, sorry. But this may not be the best WG to focus attention. The Spatial Data on the Web WG, in which we're collaborating with OGC, has a number of time experts (the kind of person who gets to decide if and when we'll have the next leap second). That WG is finishing work on the OWL Time Ontology from way back, see the Editors' draft at http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/ Cheers Phil On 14/04/2016 14:29, Víctor Rodríguez Doncel wrote: > Dear Phil, > > Is it possible to have 'temporal invited experts' (from non-W3C members)? > I think I know the use case well enough, but in case we want to have a > deeper discussion on the "POE for language resources use case" we could > easily get the participation of other institutions... > > Víctor > > > El 14/04/2016 13:55, Phil Archer escribió: >> Michael - and anyone else who might be an editor of our docs at a >> later stage. >> >> As use cases are now coming in, you may or may not want to start >> working on the actual UCR doc. To help kick things off, I have created >> a skeleton doc in the GitHub repository [1] that can be seen as it >> appears to a normal person [2]. >> >> The donkey work is done by the ReSpec library. This handles the >> version IDs, author links and W3C boiler plate. Editors just need to >> write the content. >> >> If you prefer to use a WYSIWYG editor, http://www.bluegriffon.org/ >> seems to be the tool of choice for many editors. There are 101 rules >> about how we write these docs (ids on every section, write in >> simplified (US) English, etc.) but we can cover those over time >> (perhaps with a separate call for editors so I can walk you through >> some of it). The main thing is make a start :-) >> >> HTH >> >> Phil. >> >> [1] https://github.com/w3c/poe >> [2] http://w3c.github.io/poe/ucr/ >> >> > > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2016 14:04:23 UTC