Re: Wide Review for W3C POE Deliverables from Renato Iannella on 2017-05-16 (public-poe-comments@w3.org from May 2017)

From: Renato Iannella <renato.iannella@monegraph.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 11:49:18 +1000
To: Luca Andrea Ludovico <ludovico@di.unimi.it>, Paolo Perlasca <perlasca@di.unimi.it>, "Prof. Goffredo Haus" <haus@di.unimi.it>, Adriano Baratè <barate@di.unimi.it>
Cc: POE Comment list <public-poe-comments@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2EA7A10A-8C36-4807-B7A6-45D71C3A7CE6@monegraph.com>

> On 6 Apr 2017, at 07:48, Luca Andrea Ludovico <ludovico@di.unimi.it> wrote:
> 
> Definition: The assigner Permits/Prohibits the Assignees to perform a synchronized experience using the asset (as a part of the experience) to an audience.

Dear all, the current proposal [1] for you feedback is to define synchronize as:

“The assigner Permits/Prohibits the Assignee to use the Asset in timed relations with media (audio/visual) elements of another Asset.”

Is this ok?

Renato Iannella, Monegraph
Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group

[1] https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/123 <https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/123>

Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2017 01:50:02 UTC