Review for W3C POE Deliverables - Question about Data Quality Vocabulary case from Antoine Isaac on 2017-04-29 (public-poe-comments@w3.org from April 2017)

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 01:42:59 +0200
To: <public-poe-comments@w3.org>
CC: "riccardo.albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it" <riccardo.albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
Message-ID: <59052503.5010405@few.vu.nl>

Dear all,

Here's a small piece of feedback for POE, where I'd like to specifically add Riccardo Albertoni to the thread. We've both worked on the W3C Data Quality Vocabulary, which appears as a POE use case at
https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-poe-ucr-20170223/#POE.UC.26

DQV uses ODRL for expressing a quality policy:
https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dqv/#ExpressConformanceWithPolicy
It seems that because of the latest changes on POE constraint language, especially the operands (http://w3c.github.io/poe/model/#constraint ), the example we've written is now wrong. Can you confirm this?

Thanks,

Antoine

Received on Saturday, 29 April 2017 23:43:35 UTC