Hi, Renato- I will commit to doing so. I can't guarantee that it would get an official BISG review and endorsement in that time (though we can try), but I think if I do the wordsmithing at this point, run that by Tzviya, make any changes she suggests, and then send it quickly to the small group of BISG people who have actually been involved in this, then yes, I think we can get there by the end of next week (but less likely in time for your Monday meeting). Will that work? --Bill Bill Kasdorf VP and Principal Consultant | Apex CoVantage p: 734-904-6252 m: 734-904-6252 ISNI: http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786 ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786<https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en> From: Renato Iannella [mailto:renato.iannella@monegraph.com] Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 9:47 PM To: Bill Kasdorf; Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken Cc: POE Comment list Subject: BSIG Use Cases Hi Bill/Tzviya - thanks for the meeting and discussion at TPAC. The POE WG wants to look at extracting requirements from the draft BSIG Use cases presented [1]. Do you think you could complete an update from the comments we discussed in Lisbon by next week? Many thanks... Renato Iannella, Monegraph Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/15nbqGY20IIGbTQOzKxzw59TLzwfPpRZu-1KKA97phKg/editReceived on Tuesday, 4 October 2016 17:32:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:47:06 UTC