- From: Michael Steidl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 09:39:43 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
nitmws has just labeled an issue for https://github.com/w3c/poe as "Editorial": == Error in Note of Ensure Exclusivity LeftOperand == The Ensure Exclusivity LeftOperand in the Common Vocabulary - https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-vocab/#term-ensureExclusivity - has this Note: > If used as a Duty, the assignee should be explicitly indicated as the party that is ensuring the exclusivity of the Rule. But only the assigner can ensure the exclusivity of a (permission) rule as only this party has to right to assign a rule to any assignee party. Therefore the Note should be: > If used as a Duty, the **assigner** should be explicitly indicated as the party that is ensuring the exclusivity of the Rule. This also aligns with the definition of ensureExclusivity in the ODRL 2.1 Common Vocabulary - https://www.w3.org/community/odrl/vocab/2.1/#action-ensureExclusivity See https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/299
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2018 09:39:51 UTC