public-poe-archives@w3.org from October 2017 by date

Tuesday, 31 October 2017

• Closed: [poe] fix for examples in 3.3 ODRL Profile Mechanism Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Conflict - invalid case Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Harmonize 2.6.7 Remedy property with Prohibition Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] the assignee(s) of the Duty MUST satisfy the Duty. Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] fixing selected examples Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] XML Schema issues Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Common Vocabulary Concepts/Terms used/referenced in Core Vocabulary Section Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] inconsistent requirements wrt. profile definitions Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] On requiring mutually disjoint sets of policy/rule types Renato Iannella via GitHub

Monday, 30 October 2017

• Re: [poe] On requiring mutually disjoint sets of policy/rule types Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub

Friday, 27 October 2017

• Re: [poe] JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] inconsistent requirements wrt. profile definitions Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub

Thursday, 26 October 2017

• Re: [poe] Common Vocabulary Concepts/Terms used/referenced in Core Vocabulary Section Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] XML Schema issues Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] fixing selected examples Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Common Vocabulary Concepts/Terms used/referenced in Core Vocabulary Section Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] On requiring mutually disjoint sets of policy/rule types Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] On requiring mutually disjoint sets of policy/rule types Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] fix for examples in 3.3 ODRL Profile Mechanism Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] fix for examples in 3.3 ODRL Profile Mechanism Renato Iannella via GitHub

Wednesday, 25 October 2017

• Re: [poe] Common Vocabulary Concepts/Terms used/referenced in Core Vocabulary Section Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] On requiring mutually disjoint sets of policy/rule types Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: On requiring mutually disjoint sets of policy/rule types marked as CR review simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] fix for examples in 3.3 ODRL Profile Mechanism simon via GitHub
• [poe] On requiring mutually disjoint sets of policy/rule types simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Common Vocabulary Concepts/Terms used/referenced in Core Vocabulary Section Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] fix for examples in 3.3 ODRL Profile Mechanism Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Conflict - invalid case Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Harmonize 2.6.7 Remedy property with Prohibition Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] the assignee(s) of the Duty MUST satisfy the Duty. Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub

Monday, 23 October 2017

• [poe] new commits pushed by nitmws Michael Steidl via GitHub

Tuesday, 17 October 2017

• Re: [poe] the assignee(s) of the Duty MUST satisfy the Duty. simon via GitHub

Monday, 16 October 2017

• Re: [poe] the assignee(s) of the Duty MUST satisfy the Duty. simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] the assignee(s) of the Duty MUST satisfy the Duty. Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub

Friday, 13 October 2017

• Re: [poe] JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• [poe] JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values simon via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values marked as Editorial simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property simon via GitHub

Thursday, 12 October 2017

• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property Michael Steidl via GitHub

Wednesday, 11 October 2017

• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property Ivan Herman via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property marked as bug Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub

Tuesday, 10 October 2017

• Re: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Closed: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by nitmws Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by nitmws Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub

Monday, 9 October 2017

• Re: [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub

Saturday, 7 October 2017

• Re: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource Ivan Herman via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by iherman Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource Ivan Herman via GitHub

Friday, 6 October 2017

• [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] Issue: Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource marked as JSON-LD Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example Renato Iannella via GitHub

Thursday, 5 October 2017

• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example simon via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated Renato Iannella via GitHub

Wednesday, 4 October 2017

• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example Renato Iannella via GitHub

Tuesday, 3 October 2017

• [poe] new commits pushed by nitmws Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated Michael Steidl via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example Michael Steidl via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example Renato Iannella via GitHub
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated Renato Iannella via GitHub

Sunday, 1 October 2017

• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella Renato Iannella via GitHub

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 October 2017 00:47:07 UTC