- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 09:33:59 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
No standard action? OK we will have to try to do it ourselves then, trying to get inspiration from https://www.w3.org/2012/09/odrl/archive/odrl.net/Profiles/Services/WD-20080402.html Regarding the profile mechanism, the pattern for extending actions seems ok. But that's only the pattern. I still disagree with the use of ODRL specific properties for this. But that's the topic of #160. So this ticket could be closed from the perspective of POE. But while it doesn't have a home for sure in another group (maybe DXWG can adopt it, but it's unclear to me now) is it possible to leave it here, saying this is not an issue for the ODRL vocabulary and IM? -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/159#issuecomment-304618005 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 29 May 2017 09:34:06 UTC