- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 07:35:53 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
OK then what I'm asking for is that Profiles would point to a mechanism to extend actions in a way that is still beneficial to interoperability across profiles, which is what the Web Annotation pattern for motivations tries to achieve for a different set of concepts. If this is the idea you have, you record it and #160 not discarded then I'm more than happy :-) On 18/05/17 05:04, Renato Iannella wrote: > We state at: https://w3c.github.io/poe/model/#action > "The ODRL Vocabulary [vocab-odrl] defines a standard set of common Actions that may be used and ODRL Profiles may also define Actions" > > If (and only if) we remove Profiles, then we would make it clear that terms can still be used from different vocabs in ODRL. > > Correct, there is nothing replacing the deprecated Undefined terms. > > — > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/139#issuecomment-302287810>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAnprfeApbtp4ufxxVd19soKstwFXPBmks5r67U8gaJpZM4ND6Oo>. > -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/139#issuecomment-302325440 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2017 07:36:00 UTC