Re: [poe] Relation to other standard frameworks for expressing rights statements

I'm sorry but I think this issue is to big for discussion. I want to answer your points, but I'm afraid that this will result in a long thread mixing different things.
Would it be possible to at least try to separate what follows 'Second,' from what is after "First,"?


On 04/05/17 05:22, Renato Iannella wrote:
> Proposal:
>
> 1 - update the IM to include a new property odrl:policy (hasPolicy)
> (declare as sub-property of dc:rights and http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont#hasPolicy)
>
> 2 - Remove the "target asset" section from the RDF/OWL Encoding section in the Vocab.
> (there will be an example in the IM)
>
> 3 - Remove deprecated terms as instances of Action
>
> Comments:
>
> 1 - we kept odrl:attribute as an action as CC only has cc:attributionURL and cc:attributionName (which are not appropriate actions)
>
> Question:
>
> 1 @aisaac <https://github.com/aisaac> Are you saying that an ODRL Policy can inherit a CC License?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/158#issuecomment-299088960>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAnprevtlw6HZdzu-bijE8BrZ2lmbPEhks5r2URqgaJpZM4NNqQV>.
>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/158#issuecomment-302098381 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 17 May 2017 13:58:07 UTC