- From: Renato Iannella via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 02:54:58 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
No reason in particular ;-) Actually, perhaps at the Rule level we should say: A Rule MUST have an Asset via the **relation** property. A Rule MUST have an Action via the action property. A Rule MAY have one or more Parties via the **function** property. Then state: The abstract relation and function properties MUST be represented as explicit types of these properties in the subclasses of Rule. (**better wording here**) Then we can state in the Permission/Prohibition/Duty sections what these explicit types must/my be? -- GitHub Notification of comment by riannella Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/171#issuecomment-300359659 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2017 02:55:34 UTC