- From: Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 13:14:16 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
This is a bunch of issues. 1. Actions for Duties, actions for Permissions/Obligations. I agree with Antoine, as I don't find a reason to split the actions in two categories. But I think this deserves discussion. 2. SKOS - I have no opinion about what to do. What should we implement? 3. I don't see anything wrong in Section 4.1.1. However, I see Section "3.1.1 Policy Composition" in the model as something wrong. @sereAbi What do you think about example 3 and example 4? I think you can correct them 4. Removing odrl:relation: I totally agree, with no more argument than simplicity. Does this need WG discussion? 5. Scope of party. What shall we do? I don't see Antoine's problem. 6. group/all i don't see Antoine's problem, all is "all", and group is "several". -- GitHub Notification of comment by vroddon Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/164#issuecomment-299863210 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 8 May 2017 13:14:22 UTC