- From: Renato Iannella via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 02:08:09 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
@simonstey Yes, you are correct that it is a "valid policy according to the latest IM diagram" but it is not valid according to the IM narrative: "A Duty must only be associated with a Permission" The ODRL Ontology has defined prohibition property with range owl:unionOf ( :Prohibition :Action ) Maybe we should also add disjointWith classes? Or are you saying we should support Polices with just Duties ? (and what would that mean?) -- GitHub Notification of comment by riannella Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/128#issuecomment-298479944 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2017 02:08:15 UTC