- From: Renato Iannella via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 04:22:08 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
"Constraint entity" refers to the actual IM class, and "constraint" is a general reference to any instance of a Constraint entity. So we *usually* start a section with "Thing Entity" then start to talk about just the "Thing". So Section 3.8.1 could be rewritten as: Constraint entities MAY also be used as both of the values for the leftOperand and rightOperand of a constraint. These are called "Constraint Relations" as they support more complex relationships between two constraints that needs to be compared and processed accordingly. The two constraints MUST be atomic constraints, that is, not a constraint that includes other Constraint Relations. We could drop the term "expression" throughout section 3.8 as it s not really needed. Perhaps we should call then "Complex Constraints" and not "Constraint/s Relation/s" ? -- GitHub Notification of comment by riannella Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/117#issuecomment-284942968 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2017 04:22:14 UTC