- From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 09:10:26 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
Hi everyone, Every time I look at this issue I can't prevent from thinking about semantics, and that I need a lot of time to think about them here... So I still agree with not having [ odrl:hasPolicy owl:inverseOf odrl:target ] But I'm still puzzled about the absence of any formal semantics, especially when I read "Identifies an ODRL Policy for which the identified Asset is the target Asset to all the Rules.". I've tried to find a way to make a property chain axiom work, as I had suggested above. Or an use a sort of limited inverse axiom (i.e. when odrl:target is only used with odrl:Policy as subject). But while I gave another try today, I was not successful so I'm going to declare I'm done with the issue for now! -- GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/184#issuecomment-319011757 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 31 July 2017 09:10:50 UTC