Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints

In the first Problematic Example it says:

> is => "As long as payAmount != 500 euro, the duty is not in effect hence no one has to pay anything"

I am not clear why _"...hence no one has to pay anything"_ was added?

person44 has to pay EU500, if not, the Constraint is evaluated to false, hence the Rule is not in effect - hence person44 has not meet his/her obligation.


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by riannella
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/211#issuecomment-316909627 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 21 July 2017 05:49:02 UTC