- From: Michael Steidl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 08:10:43 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
re @riannella A) I strongly support such a decision. Because currently there are three options for the things in a Policy: a) only things defined by the IM = Core Vocabulary, b) things defined by the IM/Core Vocabulary and by an associated Profile, c) things defined by the IM/Core Vocabulary and not defined by the IM, coming from somewhere else. Option c) would be awful for receivers. re @simonstey 1. Mild reminder: section 4 of the IM is completely "non-normative" - I suggested above to make essential parts of it normative 2. I get your approach. So last sentence of the 1st para of 4.3 should be rewritten to "If an ODRL Processor does not conform also to the ODRL Profile, then it may continue processing the Policy expression, but it should not assume it has interpreted the Policy expression correctly." (I've inserted an "also" to make clear it has to conform to the IM and the Profile) -- GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/210#issuecomment-315004866 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 13 July 2017 08:10:49 UTC