- From: simon via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 06:11:22 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
> You will notice in ODRL 2.1, that Remedy was applicable to Prohibitions: ah yes, but also duties: > Not only can a Prohibition have a Duty attached to it as a remedy, **even Duties themselves may have remedies,** ... -------------- > So for consequence - you still must do D1 ? we would allow duties to refer to other duties, and would only state that those other duties become effective (for the enclosing rule/policy) as consequence for not fulfilling the duty that links to them. Since duties are in effect as long as they haven't been fulfilled, _D1_ is still in effect. > And is remedy then the same as "do at least one of D1 or D2" ? 1. do _D1_ 2. if you fail to do _D1_, you have to do _D2_ instead (you can't do _D2_ unless you know that _D1_ wasn't fulfilled) -- GitHub Notification of comment by simonstey Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/209#issuecomment-313595904 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 7 July 2017 06:11:28 UTC