Re: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section

re 1: thanks, a typo issue: "... (such as assigner." The closing ) bracket is missing.
re 2: the approach sounds ok - is this explicitly defined anywhere or just inferred from the IM as a whole? Further this raises an interesting question: if a profile does not want to cover an action defined in the Common Vocabulary: does it have to exclude it explicitly? Maybe better to discuss this in another Github Issue.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/202#issuecomment-313337479 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 6 July 2017 08:57:20 UTC