- From: Michael Steidl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 08:04:10 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
@riannella re your update:
* 2.7.1 first sentence:
currently: "An ODRL Policy may share properties with its Rules."
That's ambiguous as by strict reading this makes the properties an active property of the Policy ("properties shared by a Policy with its Rules").
I suggest: "An ODRL Policy may hold properties which are shared among its Rules."
* re item 1 above: I suggest to add that requirement to the definition of relation and function:
"Any sub-properties of relation (such as target), _they have to be defined by (core?) ODRL or an ODRL Profile_."
This would clarify where a receiver of an ODRL Policy has to look to find the definition of a sub-property of relation or function. (... this would apply also to profile-specific actions, operators etc.)
--
GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/202#issuecomment-313031852 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 5 July 2017 08:04:16 UTC